highly significantp < 0.001
This difference was highly significant (χ 2 (1) = 13.605, p < 0.001), with a moderate-to-strong association between technique and outcome (Φ = 0.415, Cramer’s V = 0.415, p < 0.001).
This difference was highly significant (χ 2 (1) = 13.605, p < 0.001), with a moderate-to-strong association between technique and outcome (Φ = 0.415, Cramer’s V = 0.415, p < 0.001).