highly significantP <.001
This difference was also highly significant ( t 19 =6.256; P <.001), with a very large effect size (Cohen d =2.733, 95% CI 1.500‐3.931), and was strongly supported by Bayesian analysis (BF10=102.8).
This difference was also highly significant ( t 19 =6.256; P <.001), with a very large effect size (Cohen d =2.733, 95% CI 1.500‐3.931), and was strongly supported by Bayesian analysis (BF10=102.8).