borderline significantP = .053
When the model was further adjusted (Model 3), the difference in physical functioning was only borderline significant (mean difference −4.9 [95% CI −9.9 to 0], P = .053).
When the model was further adjusted (Model 3), the difference in physical functioning was only borderline significant (mean difference −4.9 [95% CI −9.9 to 0], P = .053).
Despite a lower score in physical functioning on univariate analysis, the multivariable analysis suggested only a borderline significance when adjusted for comprehensive demographic and clinical factors, which may indicate the multifaceted etiology of functional impairment in CP.