close to significancep=0.052
Our results agree with this, as the antimicrobial efficacy of CH was statistically lower than that of TAP (p=0.052, close to significance).
Our results agree with this, as the antimicrobial efficacy of CH was statistically lower than that of TAP (p=0.052, close to significance).
TAP showed a highly significant difference in log10 reduction from the control (p<0.001).