highly significantp < 0.001
The difference in HADS anxiety scores also remained highly significant after age adjustment (β = –7.84, p < 0.001), whereas the group difference in HADS depression scores was no longer significant (β = –2.09, p = 0.052).
The difference in HADS anxiety scores also remained highly significant after age adjustment (β = –7.84, p < 0.001), whereas the group difference in HADS depression scores was no longer significant (β = –2.09, p = 0.052).
This indicates that irritable temperament may not be significant in the context of PHPT or may have intersected with other measured temperament factors, such as cyclothymia.