Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cogn Res Princ Implic · 2026 · PMC12909722 · PMID 41699190

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0640

closest p · 1.3× alpha

0.0640

boldest claim

The sentences

a numerical trendp =.064so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

There was a numerical trend for the interaction between interruption task complexity and central code ( F (1,70) = 3.55, p =.064; word group 5.1% or 0.8 words interruption task complexity costs; arrow group 1.1% or 0.2 words interruption task complexity costs), but given the non-significance of the interaction, we refrain from interpreting this numerical trend.

also in 1,012 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.