highly significantp < 0.001
Specifically, as shown in Table 7 , when compared to the Classic MEF method, the improvements were highly significant for both EN (p < 0.001) and MI (p < 0.05).
Specifically, as shown in Table 7 , when compared to the Classic MEF method, the improvements were highly significant for both EN (p < 0.001) and MI (p < 0.05).