close to being significantp = 0.059
Note that the difference between the replica and the dog was close to being significant for O2 ( Mdiff = −0.75, SE = 0.34, t (224) = −2.18, p = 0.059, d = −0.33, 95% CI [−0.65, −0.02]). 3.2.2.
Note that the difference between the replica and the dog was close to being significant for O2 ( Mdiff = −0.75, SE = 0.34, t (224) = −2.18, p = 0.059, d = −0.33, 95% CI [−0.65, −0.02]). 3.2.2.