highly significantp = .001
However, monkey T showed a highly significant decrease in performance for stimulated patterns at high-intensity 10 Hz ECS in block 3 (χ 2 (1, N = 1087) = 10.71, p = .001) and block 4 (χ 2 (1, N = 997) = 11.97, p < .0001).
However, monkey T showed a highly significant decrease in performance for stimulated patterns at high-intensity 10 Hz ECS in block 3 (χ 2 (1, N = 1087) = 10.71, p = .001) and block 4 (χ 2 (1, N = 997) = 11.97, p < .0001).
Monkey P did not show any consistent difference in reaction time between stimulated and nonstimulated patterns (with the exception of a marginally significant difference in block 3).