No Effects of Predictability on Word-Meaning Priming and Incidental Memory.

Consistent with the accuracy data, the reaction time data also showed a nonsignificant trend towards a word-meaning priming effect (all primed conditions vs. unprimed: β = –0.060, SE = 0.043, z = –1.379, p = .168), and there was no evidence of an expectedness effect ( p s > .724). 2.2.1.3 Rate of correct responses (RCR) As an exploratory analysis, we combined the accuracy and reaction time data to form a measure of the rate of correct responses (RCR) a participant makes in this task, defined as the (proportion of correct responses/((RT in ms/60,000)) (see Vandierendonck, 2017 , for an evaluation of this method).

also in 5,406 other papers

A mixed-effects analysis showed a marginally non-significant effect of Priming (neutral and unexpected vs. unprimed), with the primed conditions showing higher consistency ratings than the unprimed condition (β = 0.098, SE = 0.056, z = 1.762, p = .078).

also in 1,493 other papers