marginally significantp = 0.076
bivia was marginally significant in the raw ( p = 0.076) and adjusted ( p = 0.091) p values in more than 30% of the tested samples. 5.4.
bivia was marginally significant in the raw ( p = 0.076) and adjusted ( p = 0.091) p values in more than 30% of the tested samples. 5.4.
An increasing trend of bacterial diversity with increasing cytological severity of cervical lesions was also observed, although the difference was nonsignificant.