marginally significantp =.052
The main effect of distance was marginally significant ( F (4,116) = 2.42, p =.052, η p 2 =.077), suggesting the trend that IT became higher when the distance between standard number and target number was smaller.
The main effect of distance was marginally significant ( F (4,116) = 2.42, p =.052, η p 2 =.077), suggesting the trend that IT became higher when the distance between standard number and target number was smaller.