marginal significancep = 0.045
While the raw male subgroup showed marginal significance (median 80 vs. 81, p = 0.045; Table 1 ), the matched subgroup exhibited a more pronounced difference (79 vs. 72, p < 0.001; Suppl.
While the raw male subgroup showed marginal significance (median 80 vs. 81, p = 0.045; Table 1 ), the matched subgroup exhibited a more pronounced difference (79 vs. 72, p < 0.001; Suppl.