a nonsignificant trendP = .12
This difference was statistically significant in stage II ( P = .046), while a nonsignificant trend favoring EGFRmu was observed in stage IA ( P = .12; Supplemental Figure 4 ).
This difference was statistically significant in stage II ( P = .046), while a nonsignificant trend favoring EGFRmu was observed in stage IA ( P = .12; Supplemental Figure 4 ).
When stratified by stage, there were stark survival differences in stage IB and a small trend in stage IA patients that could be explained by the fact that EGFRwt patients include a large subset of NSCLC cases characterized by KRAS mutations.