marginally significantp = 0.054
Rats in the second iteration showed a similar, although marginally significant pattern (AB+ vs A−, t (7) = 2.32, p = 0.054, Cohen's d = 0.82; AB+ vs B−, t (7) = 2.36, p = 0.050, Cohen's d = 0.84).
Rats in the second iteration showed a similar, although marginally significant pattern (AB+ vs A−, t (7) = 2.32, p = 0.054, Cohen's d = 0.82; AB+ vs B−, t (7) = 2.36, p = 0.050, Cohen's d = 0.84).