highly significantp < 0.0001
Table 1 shows that the choice of the negative binomial distribution was justified, as the dispersion parameter (φ) was highly significant in both models ( p < 0.0001 for both, with Phi for Model 1 = 0.8161).
Table 1 shows that the choice of the negative binomial distribution was justified, as the dispersion parameter (φ) was highly significant in both models ( p < 0.0001 for both, with Phi for Model 1 = 0.8161).