highly significantp = 0.0009
In contrast, a comparison of the parabolic coefficients between the lCF size profile (Table S2 ) and FC profiles (Table S1 ) revealed a strong and highly significant difference ( F (1,11) = 21.85, p = 0.0009, d = 1.41).
In contrast, a comparison of the parabolic coefficients between the lCF size profile (Table S2 ) and FC profiles (Table S1 ) revealed a strong and highly significant difference ( F (1,11) = 21.85, p = 0.0009, d = 1.41).