marginally significantp = 0.05
However, the interaction between task type and expectation level was marginally significant, F (2, 68) = 1.82, p = 0.05.
However, the interaction between task type and expectation level was marginally significant, F (2, 68) = 1.82, p = 0.05.
Discussion Role of target cue probability expectations in facilitating event− and time-based prospective memory processing From the background task performance in experiment 1’s EBPM, the no-expectancy, low-expectancy, and high-expectancy groups showed a decreasing trend in performance.