47 Comments in Duce (that risks disclosure is ‘not something that can be determined by reference to expert evidence alone ’ 48 ), and very recently in Butler v Ward (that ‘[e]xpert evidence may have a role to play in assisting the court’ in Montgomery -related litigation 49 )—together with a notation that it is ‘highly significant’ where the expert evidence on both sides agrees that a risk was material and should have been disclosed 50 —suggest that a similar pattern is unfolding in the UK too.
← all excerpts
Ten years on: a 'Montgomery map' for healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom and Beyond.
1
—
—