failed to reach significancep =.055
Although the marginal contrast suggested slightly lower PSEs in the passive than in the active movement, t (17) = 2.72, p =.022, this difference was not supported by the within-attention contrasts: Active-start versus passive-start and active-shift versus passive-shift were both nonsignificant (both p values =.477), whereas the cross-attention contrasts which confound movement type with attention allocation either failed to reach significance (passive-start vs. active-shift, p =.055) or showed no difference (active-start vs. passive-shift, p =.955).