Intramedullary versus crossed pinning for paediatric distal radius fractures: clinical decision patterns and biomechanical validation integrating real-world practice with growth plate stress finite element analysis.

J Orthop Surg Res · 2026 · PMC13262362 · PMID 41723475

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.2200

closest p · 4.4× alpha

0.2200

boldest claim

The sentences

a nonsignificant trendp = 0.22not close (p > 0.1)

A nonsignificant trend towards a greater incidence of wound infection was observed in the CP group (5/59, 8.5%) than in the IM group (1/43, 2.3%; p = 0.22).

also in 5,406 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.

​​Intramedullary versus crossed pinning for paediatric distal radius fractures: clinical decision patterns and biomechanical validation integrating real-world practice with growth plate stress finite element analysis.

The sentences

Intramedullary versus crossed pinning for paediatric distal radius fractures: clinical decision patterns and biomechanical validation integrating real-world practice with growth plate stress finite element analysis.