highly significantp < 0.001
Regarding the fixed effects (see Table 1 ), a highly significant Time × Group interaction was observed, F (1, 195.00) = 90.43, p < 0.001, with a substantial effect size ( η p 2 = 0.32).
Regarding the fixed effects (see Table 1 ), a highly significant Time × Group interaction was observed, F (1, 195.00) = 90.43, p < 0.001, with a substantial effect size ( η p 2 = 0.32).
Analysis of the random effects structure revealed that the Subject ID random intercept was marginally significant (Wald Z = 1.91, p = 0.056), accounting for 14% of the total variance (ICC = 0.14).
Among the control variables, fluid intelligence (CPM) was significantly associated with higher TEC scores, while age showed a marginal trend, and the effect of gender was not significant.