marginally significantp = .052
The interaction between load and language was marginally significant ( F (2, 96) = 3.06, p = .052, η 2 p = .06), with higher accuracy in high load for L1 compared to L2 ( p < .05).
The interaction between load and language was marginally significant ( F (2, 96) = 3.06, p = .052, η 2 p = .06), with higher accuracy in high load for L1 compared to L2 ( p < .05).