a positive trendP =0.062
Conversely, Anaerococcus abundance was in a positive trend with FENO (r=0.548, P =0.062), although this association did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 4J ).
Conversely, Anaerococcus abundance was in a positive trend with FENO (r=0.548, P =0.062), although this association did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 4J ).
In addition, several phyla with low relative abundance ( Campylobacterota, Patescibacteria , and Spirochaetota ; all FDR-adjusted P <0.1) showed an elevated trend in Cluster 1 compared with Cluster 2 ( Figure 5H ).