highly significantp = 0.001
PERMANOVA revealed that treatment combination explained 57.5% of the total variation (R 2 = 0.575) and the effect was highly significant ( p = 0.001) ( Table S5 ).
PERMANOVA revealed that treatment combination explained 57.5% of the total variation (R 2 = 0.575) and the effect was highly significant ( p = 0.001) ( Table S5 ).
During the cotton growing period, under W2 and W3 treatments, CAT and UE activities showed an increasing trend, while AKP and ALPT activities decreased.