highly significantP < 0.001
McNemar’s test for paired comparisons revealed a highly significant difference between the 2 diagnostic approaches ( P < 0.001).
McNemar’s test for paired comparisons revealed a highly significant difference between the 2 diagnostic approaches ( P < 0.001).
Subgroup considerations QoH performance showed a numerical trend toward STE territory dependence, with inferior patterns appearing more prone to misclassification than anterior patterns.