highly significantp < 0.0005
There was a highly significant main effect of the evaluation periods (F(2, 19) = 46.04; p < 0.0005).
There was a highly significant main effect of the evaluation periods (F(2, 19) = 46.04; p < 0.0005).
Values measured before and three months following the SLO training significantly improved compared to those measured before the training process (Bonferroni pairwise comparison p = 0.012), while the difference was marginally significant between acuities measured before and immediately after SLO training (Bonferroni pairwise comparison p = 0.085).