Mixing costs and switch costs when switching stimulus dimensions in serial predictions.

Psychol Res · 2008 · PMC2367385 · PMID 18443820

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0850

closest p · 1.7× alpha

0.0920

boldest claim

The sentences

failed to reach significancep = 0.085so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Also, switch costs were numerically higher in relevant secondary sequence trials (2.9%) than in irrelevant secondary sequence trials (0.5%) but the corresponding interaction of trial type and relevance of the secondary sequence failed to reach significance ( F (1, 19) = 3.3; p = 0.085).

also in 4,113 other papers

close to significancep = 0.092so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The main effect of dimension was close to significance ( F (2, 38) = 2.5; ε = 1.0; p = 0.092).

also in 2,130 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.