marginally significant tendencyp = .076
There was a marginally significant tendency that this effect was more pronounced in the dyspareunia group, F (1, 68) = 3.24, p = .076, f = 0.22.
There was a marginally significant tendency that this effect was more pronounced in the dyspareunia group, F (1, 68) = 3.24, p = .076, f = 0.22.