The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return.

Cogn Psychol · 2009 · PMC2734060 · PMID 19520369

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0100

closest p · 0.2× alpha

0.0900

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .01actually significant

The main effect of return versus non-return was highly significant, F (1, 5) = 31.29, p < .01, as was the main effect of saccade number, F (1, 5) = 31.29, p < .05.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = .09so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

A separate paired comparison of the 2-back effect (2-back versus non-return) was marginally significant, t (5) = 4.59, p = .09.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.