highly significantP < .001
For working memory manipulation, digit symbol was a highly significant covariate ( F 1,100 = 16.01, P < .001), but the difference between the 2 groups remained significant ( F 1,100 = 8.62, P = .004).
For working memory manipulation, digit symbol was a highly significant covariate ( F 1,100 = 16.01, P < .001), but the difference between the 2 groups remained significant ( F 1,100 = 8.62, P = .004).
The results showed several modestly significant relationships between clinical and cognitive measures, but, following correction for multiple comparisons, only an inverse relationship between the negative syndrome and digit symbol–scaled score remained significant.