highly significantP < 2.0 × 10 -16
We found the effect of rurality to be highly significant ( P < 2.0 × 10 -16 ), but it explains only 28% of the overall variation in log positional error magnitude.
We found the effect of rurality to be highly significant ( P < 2.0 × 10 -16 ), but it explains only 28% of the overall variation in log positional error magnitude.