marginally significantp = 0.08
There was also a marginally significant main effect of relative salience, F (1,12) = 3.54, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.23, indicating that participants were faster to respond when the target was more salient than the decoy.
There was also a marginally significant main effect of relative salience, F (1,12) = 3.54, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.23, indicating that participants were faster to respond when the target was more salient than the decoy.
Pair-wise comparisons revealed significant differences in error rate between separation 1 and separation 3, t (11) = 2.42, p <0.05 and between separation 1 and separation 5, t (11) = 3.41, p <0.05, but failed to reach significance between separation 3 and separation 5, t (11) = 1.70, p = 0.116.