Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparison of two approaches for measuring household wealth via an asset-based index in rural and peri-urban settings of Hunan province, China.

Emerg Themes Epidemiol · 2010 · PMC2942820 · PMID 20813070

1
hedged sentence
0.0020
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0020
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = 0.002actually significant
To illustrate this issue, using the PCA extraction method, we found highly significant Kruskal-Wallis test results both for rural and peri-urban settings (annual household per-capita income in rural setting Kruskal-Wallis = 14.7, d.f. = 3, p = 0.002 and peri-urban setting Kruskal-Wallis = 21.0, d.f. = 3, p <0.001 and for per-adult income in rural setting Kruskal-Wallis = 23.7, d.f. = 3, p = 0.001 and peri-urban setting Kruskal-Wallis = 35.1, d.f. = 3, p <0.001).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.