Individual working memory capacity is uniquely correlated with feature-based attention when combined with spatial attention.

Atten Percept Psychophys · 2011 · PMC3025109 · PMID 21258911

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0790

closest p · 1.6× alpha

0.1010

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .079so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Analysis of high spans (OSPAN > 50, N = 9) revealed a trend towards a spatial by feature cueing interaction, F(1, 8) = 3.137, p = .114, η 2 = .282, with a marginally significant orientation cuing effect at validly cued spatial locations, F(1, 8) = 4.039, p = .079, η 2 = .336, but not at invalidly cued locations, F(1, 8) = 1.827, p = .213, η 2 = .186.

also in 15,194 other papers

a positive trendp = .101not close (p > 0.1)

No other correlations were significant (all p values > .10); however, the correlation of WMC with spatial cueing produced a positive trend, r = .224, p = .101, suggesting possible shared variance among feature cueing, spatial attention, and WMC.

also in 6,779 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.