Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Are nested networks more robust to disturbance? A test using epiphyte-tree, comensalistic networks.

PLoS One · 2011 · PMC3092765 · PMID 21589931

1
hedged sentence
0.0007
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0007
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP<0.0007actually significant
After accounting for the effect of network size on N (type-2 regression: N = 0.59+0.077*logSize, F 1,57 = 9.98, P<0.0025), differences between network types were highly significant (F 2,56 = 8.21, P<0.0007) and pair-wise comparisons discriminated comensalistic networks from antagonistic and mutualistic ones (Scheffé-test: P<0.0009 and P<0.029, respectively), which differed marginally between themselves (P>0.052).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.