A meta-analysis of predation risk effects on pollinator behaviour.

PLoS One · 2011 · PMC3113803 · PMID 21695187

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0750

closest p · 1.5× alpha

0.0750

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantP = 0.075so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The difference among pollinator size categories was marginally significant for live predators (Qb = 0.64, P = 0.075, df = 2), but not for artificial spider models ( Fig. 4 , Qb = 5.24, P = 0.124, df = 2).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.