marginally significantp = 0.06
Looking only at trials where the pre- and postsaccadic shapes were elongated (both aspect ratios greater than 1.2, corresponding to 21.21% of all Different trials included in the reaction time analysis), there was a marginally significant correlation between the Different preview log-transformed reaction times and the size of relative orientation differences ( r = 0.14, t (6) = 2.33 p = 0.06).