Rate effects on timing, key velocity, and finger kinematics in piano performance.

PLoS One · 2011 · PMC3121738 · PMID 21731615

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp <.001actually significant

To assess whether intensity changes were associated with tempo effects on anticipation times, the effects of key velocity on anticipation times were partialled out, as before; the effect of tempo on residual finger anticipation times was still highly significant ( F (4,40) = 16.10, p <.001).

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

These effects of tempo on both CVs and key velocities were observed in all pianists, as indicated by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests (for Pianists 2–4, p <.05; Pianist 1, p = .07, marginally significant).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.