Representation of multiplication facts--evidence for partial verbal coding.

For raw RT and error rates the main effect of articulatory suppression was marginally significant in the RT analysis [F(1, 11) = 3.82, p = .08, η p 2 = .26] and reliable in the error analysis [F(1, 11) = 11.86, p < .01, η p 2 = .52]: responses became less accurate (8.4% vs. 5.4%) but tended to be faster (2504 ms vs. 2598 ms), while participants performed in the concurrent articulation condition.

also in 26,082 other papers