Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Does adding risk-trends to survival models improve in-hospital mortality predictions? A cohort study.

BMC Health Serv Res · 2011 · PMC3161846 · PMID 21777460

3
hedged sentences
0.0001
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0001
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .0001actually significant
These three trend indicators were still highly significant ( p < .0001) when added jointly to the existing model using the following transformations: X 3 + X 3 *log(X) for the absolute change in the risk score from the previous day; X 0.5 + X 0.5 *log(X) for the absolute change in the risk score from the start of the trend; and X -2 + X -2 *log(X) for the number of consecutive days with a trend in the risk score (we first shifted all original values up by the minimum observed value to ensure the values were greater than zero).

also in 132,142 other papers

a decreasing trendno p-value reported
The adjusted hazard ratio decreased as the number of days with a decreasing trend in the risk score increased (Figure 2A , dotted line) and as the absolute change in the risk score from the previous day decreased (Figure 2B , dotted line).

also in 47,180 other papers

an increasing trendno p-value reported
The adjusted hazard ratio increased as the number of days with an increasing trend in the risk score increased (Figure 2A , solid line), the absolute change in the risk score from the previous day increased (Figure 2B , solid line), and the absolute change in the risk score from the start of the trend increased (Figure 2C, s olid line).

also in 63,971 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.