highly significantp = 0.0011
Subregional analyses revealed that this increase was highly significant in the caudal DG (71%; p = 0.0011), but non-significant in the rostral DG (p = 0.29) ( Fig. 2A ).
Subregional analyses revealed that this increase was highly significant in the caudal DG (71%; p = 0.0011), but non-significant in the rostral DG (p = 0.29) ( Fig. 2A ).