close to significanceP = 0.06
The comparison of the mean effect size between subgroups was close to significance ( P = 0.06), however, which does not allow one to ensure that the effects of proning were significantly different between subgroups.
The comparison of the mean effect size between subgroups was close to significance ( P = 0.06), however, which does not allow one to ensure that the effects of proning were significantly different between subgroups.
There was only a nonsignificant trend to explain effect size variation by actual prone duration ( z = -1.88; P = 0.06).