marginally significantP = 0.052
Treatment advantages were marginally significant for MF/F 400/10 versus F 10 ( P = 0.052) and MF/F 200/10 versus F 10 ( P = 0.063) adjusting for smoking and study.
Treatment advantages were marginally significant for MF/F 400/10 versus F 10 ( P = 0.052) and MF/F 200/10 versus F 10 ( P = 0.063) adjusting for smoking and study.