Time Dilation Induced by Object Motion is Based on Spatiotopic but not Retinotopic Positions.

Front Psychol · 2012 · PMC3289113 · PMID 22403562

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant

Results of the ANOVA indicated that the main effect of Motion was highly significant [ F (1, 11) = 31.080, p < 0.001], which was also true for that of Duration [ F (2, 22) = 56.407, p < 0.001].

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.060so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

failed to reach significancep > 0.999not close (p > 0.1)

Post hoc paired-sample t -tests reported significant difference between Static and Moving conditions at the presentation duration of 1200 ms [ t (11) = −4.586, p = 0.002], though it failed to reach significance under 800 ms [ t (11) = 0.561, p > 0.999], and with marginally significant difference under 1000 ms [ t (11) = −2.717, p = 0.060] presentation duration (all Bonferroni-corrected).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.