highly significantp<.001
Figure 3f shows that totalPER increased in proportion to fivePER for the wildtype flies, yielding a highly significant effect (F(5, 443) = 201.54, p<.001, η 2 = .70).
Figure 3f shows that totalPER increased in proportion to fivePER for the wildtype flies, yielding a highly significant effect (F(5, 443) = 201.54, p<.001, η 2 = .70).
In particular, at 3 hfd, the difference between the totalPER scores of the memory and control groups yielded a marginal significance for the first 10 trials (F (1, 72) = 4.07, p<.047, η 2 = .05).
Although the memory effect failed to reach significance at 2 (F(1, 96) = 1.93, p<.17, η 2 = .02) or 3 hfd (F(1, 72) = 1.9, p<.17, η 2 = .03) as well, a difference in the habituation curves of memory and the control groups was evident over the first 10 trials (data not presented).