How do children deal with inconsistencies in text? An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in good and poor reading comprehenders.

Read Writ · 2012 · PMC3395345 · PMID 23293428

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0500

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0500

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp < .05actually significant

The above pattern of results was evident in the significant ( F 1 ) and marginally significant ( F 2 ) Consistency × Location × Group interaction ( F (1, 55) = 4.51, p < .05, η p 2 = .08; F 2 (1, 2) = 12.99, p < .1, η p 2 = .87).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.