Incidental learning of temporal structures conforming to a metrical framework.

Front Psychol · 2012 · PMC3425964 · PMID 22936921

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0600

closest p · 1.2× alpha

0.0960

boldest claim

The sentences

fell just short of significancep = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The learning score (comparing the RT of the test block to the average RT of exposure blocks preceding and following the test block) fell just short of significance, F (1, 23) = 3.92, p = 0.06.

also in 102 other papers

fell short of significancep = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

For the post-silence events, only the DM exposure group demonstrated slower RT for Block 6 in comparison to the surrounding exposure blocks, even if this learning score fell short of significance, F (1, 45) = 3.17, p = 0.08.

also in 361 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.096so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

For both DM and TM groups indications of learning can be observed for the run events with RT slowing down in Block 6, even if this RT change failed to reach significance, F (1, 45) = 2.89, p = 0.096.

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.