Overall regression models and individual predictor variables were highly significant for all species except C. auriga , however, the models only explained a low proportion of the variation in abundance for each species, ranging from 11.5% (adjusted R 2 ) for C. vagabundus to 20.8% for C. trifascialis ( Table 3 ).
← all excerpts
Influence of dietary specialization and resource availability on geographical variation in abundance of butterflyfish.
1
—
—