marginally significantp < .10
This effect was significant for extremely negative images (5.62), t (20) = 2.88, p < .01, and marginally significant for moderately negative images (3.02), t (20) = 1.75, p < .10.
This effect was significant for extremely negative images (5.62), t (20) = 2.88, p < .01, and marginally significant for moderately negative images (3.02), t (20) = 1.75, p < .10.
This effect was present for moderately negative images that were watched (5.40) or labeled (4.97), t (27) = 3.48, p < .01, but showed only a trend toward significance for extremely negative images that were watched (7.60) or labeled (7.52), t (27) = 1.63, p < .15.